“Such as” parenthetical phrases

by | Jul 22, 2012 | Grammar & Usage

Commas are most probably the tiniest creature that can cause heartbreaks to any copy editor. The simple reason is that they are not solely governed by rules. Arguably, using commas have as many exceptions as there are rules.

Consider such as for example.

The such as phrase may, or may not, take commas based on the context. Compare these two phrases:

Animals such as lion and tiger are ferocious predators.

Wild animals, such as lion and tiger, are generally ferocious.

In the first example, the phrase such as lion and tiger acts as a restrictive phrase, identifying the characteristics of Animals. However, in the second sentence, it only serves as an example, hence not essential for the meaning of the sentence. So the phrase is parenthetical in the second example and requires commas to separate them.

Finding out whether the such as phrase is essential or not follows the same logic for identifying relative clauses as restrictive or nonrestrictive: lift off the phrase and see whether the sentence conveys the same meaning. If so, the phrase is parenthetical and needs comma(s). Else, the phrase is defining and no commas to be used.

  1. Logesh (@mathivathanan)

    Interesting… I like using such as in a different context — to use ‘such’ and ‘as’ away from each other — makes up such weird-looking yet catchy sentences as this one 🙂

    • myooka

      Thanks for sharing that, Logesh. How are you?
      Copy editors at their early stages of editing tend to confuse between the two structures I explained here.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar posts you may like . . .

Appositives, the twins of Grammarville

Appositives, the twins of Grammarville

Imagine this village, Grammarville, with three pairs of twins who’re like the grammar concept called appositives: the Siamese twins – super attached, just like how necessary appositives are for a sentence’s meaning; non-identical twins – not-so-tied, giving extra details like non-restrictive appositives; and mischievous identical twins ¬– context, like knowing which twin’s who, decides their use. Identifying twins needs attention – so is the case for editors!

Understanding subject–verb agreement

Understanding subject–verb agreement

The principle behind subject–verb agreement is simple. But ensuring subject–verb agreement is not as easy as it sounds. Errors in agreement can occur because the writer or editor is unaware of the specific rules of subject–verb agreement. Even for those who know the rule, mistakes can happen due to typos, oversight, or rushing through the editing process.