A Tale of Two Countries: British Vs American English

by | Feb 18, 2019 | Language, Spelling

English… The language that almost every country seeks to master in order for it to be considered a true global player. You may have wondered why the English language is used for global communication. The answer is quite similar to why there is a sudden demand to learn Chinese: business, politics and which country will hold the much coveted ‘superpower’ title. For years, English has been evolving. The digital revolution has accelerated its evolution with new terms and slangs coming out every year. Whether it be in America or the United Kingdom, English continues to have some border-specific rules.

Technology has solidified the need for global citizens to have, at the very least, a basic grasp of the language. As the digital space grows to unify us, it would be interesting to see whether that would, in turn, affect any aspect of grammar evolution in the English language. But for now, let us take a quick, shallow dive into the factors that prompted the differences between American and British English. While we are immersed in our Dickens-less version of A Tale of Two… er… Countries, we will also explore some of the basic grammatical differences that every editor ought to know about.

What came first, American English or British English?

The most drastic form of differences that editors face comes to the written form. However, it is universally apparent that both versions differ phonetically. Starting with the accent, we find that the American form of pronunciation is actually closer to the original speakers of English because of its rhoticity (pronunciation of the ‘r’ sound) until it was historically considered ‘upper class’ to adopt non-rhoticity in Southern England. This, over time, transformed into the standard British accent that we find people swooning over in the modern world. Of course, variations of accents are present even within different cities and states, let alone across borders. There are more nuances to this subject, so readers who are interested can follow the below link “Do you speak American?”, a PBS documentary that explores the history of English in America.

Uncovering Grammar Differences


Another notable difference is the difference in spelling. The reason behind this divide is Noah Webster. “Aha! That dictionary guy!” was my first thought when I read his name. And yes, he is the mind behind the much-touted Webster’s Dictionary. Back when America had gained its independence, Webster believed it important to establish a separate culture independent of their former oppressors – the British. What better way to establish that than with language, the very fabric of any culture?

Right from the basic color vs. colour to the slightly more esoteric anesthesia vs. anaesthesia, the differences can be explained if one could understand the basic rule behind them.

Greek-derived spellings that saw the ‘-ise’ in British Engish became an ‘-ize’ in American English. Likewise, ‘-yse’ became ‘-yze’ and ‘-ogue’ became ‘-og’, while both ‘ae’ and ‘oe’ in the Greek words became simplified to an ‘e’. It is important to note that the British English accepts both the ‘-ise’ and ‘-ize’ variations, whereas the American English follows the ‘-ize’ version. Most international organizations tend to follow the ‘-ize’ version

In Latin-derived words, we have the British spellings with ‘-our’ that became ‘-or’ in American, ‘-re’ became ‘er’, and ‘-ce’ became ‘-se’.

Of course, there are more differences like sulfur vs sulphur and aluminum vs aluminium, which, thanks to Mr. Webster, has left us all scratching our heads. Luckily his other radical variations like tung instead of tongue and wimmin for women never took off.


Apart from the difference in their use of quotation marks American and British English face off in their usage of punctuation in their titles. Titles such as ‘Mr’, ‘Mrs’, and ‘Dr’ will be followed by a full stop (.) when used by their American counterparts: thus, Mr., Mrs., and Dr. would be considered appropriate according to American usage.

Verb Usage

The past tense of certain verbs is another focus point for editors when it comes to deciphering which style of English one must follow. For instance, verbs like to dream in the past tense become dreamt according to the British (Br) and dreamed according to the Americans (Am). The same can be seen in the case of to learn, to wet and to fit forms: learnt (Br) vs learned (Am), wet (Br) vs wetted (Am) and fit (Br) vs fitted (Am).


In Britain, you may be ready to be introduced to the team that you are in, while in America it becomes that team that you are on. And while you are at it, you may want to choose if you want to go out with your team on the weekend. If so, I would assume that you are in America. However, if you are deliberating whether to go out with your team at the weekend, I would assume you are in a country that follows the British standard of English (there are quite a few of them!).

Collective Nouns

One would assume that collective nouns such as audience and government should be treated as singular; however, the British took a different approach by choosing to use them in the plural. For example, in America, they would say that their “Government is very busy”, while the Brits would say their “Government are very busy”.

Of course, these differences are not specific to England and America. Former English colonial nations, including India, follow the British standards for English. Despite the differences, editors are usually told which style of English they are required to follow. It is very possible that editors or readers may have come across other variations that they have found to be of interest. Feel free to share them below!

What next for you?

You may read or watch the following:



1 Comment
  1. Sanjana Keerthi

    Hi Readers!
    Please feel free to comment your observations in border specific grammar differences (Am Vs. Br)! There are many, so I encourage you to list any you may know about (not mentioned in the article) in the comments below!



  1. The tale continues… – Editor’s Essentials - […] of our recent articles, “The tale of two countries“, received a mixed response from the readers. Some discussions ensued.…
Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Posts

Preparing a copyeditor’s résumé: The basics

Preparing a copyeditor’s résumé: The basics

Over the past two years, I have been an independent hiring consultant for typesetting companies, screening résumés and interviewing candidates for the role of copyeditor. My previous stints as a copyediting manager also included interviewing and recruiting candidates, which meant that when it was recruitment time, I reviewed a lot of résumés. The screening process is usually an elimination process: with a quick glance, any résumé with spelling mistakes, wrong use of capitalization, messed-up margins, weird spacing, and irregular font sizing would scream for elimination – in that order. When it comes to résumé writing, these small details might disclose how much effort you put in – or did not put in.