A track changes hack and a course announcement

by | Apr 21, 2023 | Courses, Microsoft Word, Spelling

As an editor, you are sure to have worked with track changes. Track changes show the changes that the editor made to a manuscript so that the author can review the edits and finalize the proof.

Let’s say the track changes feature is enabled. You are running spell check and standardizing the manuscript to “ize” spelling. For example, you are changing “characterise” to “characterize”. But you notice that the entire word “characterise” is deleted and replaced with “characterize”. Like this:

For some reason, you don’t want to delete and replace the entire word but show only the change in the specific letter. Like this:

If there are scores of such occurrences, along with other words of such variation (such as “popularize” and “familiarize”), you might end up finding the word (or the string “ise”), delete “s” and insert “z”. (You might have already noticed that even if you select only the letter “s” and replaced it with “z”, the entire word gets deleted and replaced!) An annoying task, indeed, isn’t it?

But we may achieve this much more easily. I will consider the case of you finding each instance of “ise” and changing it to “ize”. Here is the

  1. For the first such instance, enable track changes, delete the letter “s” and insert “z”.
  2. Disable track changes. Copy the string “isze” [deleted “s” and inserted “z”].
  3. Use the Find feature to find other instances of the string and paste the copied string. That’s it.

What’s so special about this hack is that you can use this hack to copy text from one document and paste it in another document preserving all deletions and insertions. But be careful that the track changes feature is disabled in both documents.

Standardizing “ise” to “ize” is only one of the variations an editor may carry out. There are other variations such as “our” vs “or”, “ae” to “e”, “re” to “er”, among others. My course on variations between American English and British English provides a comprehensive overview of these differences. Comprising 3 lessons, 10 topics, 14 quizzes covering around 250 sentences from published academic work, and 2 sample editing assignments, this course provides you with a platform to master this skill.

Yes, I want to register for this course!

And that’s just the beginning! This course is part of a larger series that will cover even more essential skills for writers and editors. So, what are you waiting for? Whether you’re a writer, editor, or just someone who wants to improve your written communication skills, Editor’s Essentials has the tools you need.

Sign up for the course on spelling variations between American English and British English today, and take your language skills to the next level.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Posts

Appositives, the twins of Grammarville

Appositives, the twins of Grammarville

Imagine this village, Grammarville, with three pairs of twins who’re like the grammar concept called appositives: the Siamese twins – super attached, just like how necessary appositives are for a sentence’s meaning; non-identical twins – not-so-tied, giving extra details like non-restrictive appositives; and mischievous identical twins ¬– context, like knowing which twin’s who, decides their use. Identifying twins needs attention – so is the case for editors!

Using boldface for formatting

Using boldface for formatting

Three common types of formatting followed in the publishing industry are italics, boldface, and underlines. In a previous post, we discussed the role of italics in formatting text. In this post, let’s discuss some occurrences where boldface is used. Headings As you...